User talk:Fat pig73

Welcome

Hello, Fat pig73, welcome to Wikipedia.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar

None

More... • Learn how

Fix wikilinks

More... • Learn how

Update with new information

More... • Learn how

Expand short articles

More... • Learn how

Check and add references

More... • Learn how

Fix original research issues

More... • Learn how

Improve lead sections

More... • Learn how

Add an image

More... • Learn how

Translate and clean up

More... • Learn how

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! —Plato

Great stuff!

Rivers of Toronto

Hello, I don't agree with the the need for this subcategory. Only a few of the rivers and creeks mentioned here are contained completely within Toronto. Most of them start outside Toronto and flow into the city. Why not leave them as Rivers of Ontario?

Atrian 04:10, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wnated to thank you for all the additions and extra work on Toronto Transit Commission and the related articles. These keep evolving much further than one would think they could, thanks to work like yours! Radagast 03:33, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events

Hi. I noticed you have edited some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! — Insta ntnood 21:37, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Runway numbering

In reference to your recent edit of the Toronto/Buttonville Municipal Airport article, runways are numbered by their direction (usually magnetic, except in the far north). So a runway where you take off with a heading of ~30° will be runway 03, a runway where you take off directly west will be runway 27, etc. Buttonville has no runway 01 or 02. David 15:40, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)

Sir

I have redirected some of your new pages. We do not put pages under people's titles and we do not have multiple articles on the same person. Rmhermen 13:30, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Eglinton West stations

FP, I admire your work on TTC articles. Please keep it up.

I am afraid that the articles on proposed stations on lines that were nver built are likely to be nominated for VfD at some point, and it would be hard to defend them since the stations have never existed, and probably never will. Fuerthermore, there is little information in the articles. I think it would be better to transfer what info there is into the Eg West Line article (which would flesh that out a bit), and then redirect the station pages to that article. Ground Zero 16:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

TTC cleanup

Appreciate your continued work on TTC. A suggestion: instead of adding the "Return to Toronto Transit Commission" to each article, why not put it in the template? Cleduc 03:06, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

TTC Subway Lines

I moved the page TTC Subway Lines to User:Fat pig73/TTC Subway Lines since it appears that this is a sandbox item. If it's intended as a template, please create it in the Template: space when you're done working on it. Thanks, Kelly Martin 03:10, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Categorizing

I'm not sure if you're clear on the rules for the category system, because you have a tendency to file articles in every last category they could possibly fit (eg. filing a GO Transit station in Category:GO Transit, Category:List of GO Stations, Category:Transportation in Ontario and Category:Regional rail systems). Wikipedia has a very strict policy about not filing articles simultaneously in categories and subcategories of those same categories. An article goes only in the narrowest appropriate category.

A GO Transit station should thus be filed only in Category:GO Transit stations. That category is then filed as a subcategory of the next larger category ("GO Transit"), which is in turn filed under "Transportation in Toronto", "Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area" and "Regional rail systems". And then "Transportation in Toronto" and "Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area" are filed under "Transportation in Ontario". You do not file every individual article in each and every one of those categories. Bearcat 1 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)

Also, don't overload articles with excessive and inappropriate "See also" links (e.g. Rainbow and Magic Lantern Cinemas. It is not necessary to include see also and external links for every movie chain operating in Canada in every individual article. The only external links on the Rainbow Cinemas article should be to pages about Rainbow Cinemas, and the category link itself is sufficient when it comes to linking to other chains. (And going back to GO Transit stations, for that matter, it's not necessary to add a "See also GO Transit" link if you've already linked to GO Transit in the article body.) Bearcat 2 July 2005 01:15 (UTC)

Image:7f87.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:7f87.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

Please kindly make sure of the accuracy of your edits before you upload them. Many thanks. — Insta ntnood 15:24, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Roads on AfD

Some road articles you created were nominated for deletion recently (by me). I felt that I should inform you of this. The roads in question are Coxwell Avenue, Denison Street, Eastern Avenue (Toronto), Neville Park Boulevard, and Transit Road. Another road, Midland Avenue is also up for deletion, though it was created by User:64.229.26.133 (is this you when you gorgot to login? the edits look similar to yours...) Anyway, you can find the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto-area roads, so make sure you add your input. If you have any questions, please leave a message here, or on my talk page. Mindmatrix 00:26, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More roads on AfD

Hi again, a few more road articles you created are on AfD. They are: Wilson Avenue (Toronto) and Pemberton Avenue. Additionally, three more roads were included in that batch: Brimley Road. Birchmount Road and Parkwoods Village Drive (Toronto). See the Toronto-area roads (group 2) AfD for the details, and to add your vote. Mindmatrix 17:39, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Simpson's

I wanted to inform you that I nominated your article Robert Simpson's Department Stores for deletion. There already is a Simpson's article. Skeezix1000 13:24, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian police forces

While the articles are interesting, could you please try to follow Wikipedia procedures when creating them, including bolding in the right places and categorising correctly. And please don't add those tables - they're ugly, inaccurate and pointless and I will delete them. Thanks. -- Necrothesp 21:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rochester Subway rolling stock?

One of the external links had a picture of a car on the line. It was clearly just a streetcar.

Can I ask where you got the information that they used full size Metro cars? -- Geo Swan 12:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial Court

good initiative on the Provincial Court article. Should it not be Provincial Offences Court? ect... --CyclePat 13:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title first reference

Hello. When creating a new article, please remember that the first time the title appears in the text, it should be surrounded by three apostrophes on each side, '''like this'''. The Wiki software makes the text between the apostrophes come out in bold, like this. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style for other formatting conventions. Thank you. JoaoRicardo^talk 06:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vivayork Van Hool AG300 5208.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Vivayork Van Hool AG300 5208.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Admrboltz (T | C) 17:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cityflagcol.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cityflagcol.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 02:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:5f88.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:5f88.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 06:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Qorsion_Label.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Qorsion_Label.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 02:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes

Hi, I was wondering about the succession boxes you've been putting on articles like John Strachan and Family Compact. Traditionally those boxes are for individuals serving in some political office, but "leader of the Family Compact" was not an office or anything more than general recognition...and I don't know what "Canadian Tory" is supposed to be on Family Compact, I don't think it's very useful to link it to actual conservative political parties later on, is it? I just find that these boxes don't make sense. Adam Bishop 04:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:DSC01291.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01291.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 04:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A846.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A846.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 14:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Please, when you write articles assert why the companies are notable... otherwise they can be easily deleted. Have the sold millions of boats? Are there many news articles about them? etc. Thank you. gren グレン ^? 06:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Ardenn 13:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DSC01179.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01179.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 07:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DSC01323.JPG)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01323.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 07:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Milliken GO Station.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Milliken GO Station.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 14:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Subway BMT Q car

Hello, and first off I'd like to thank you for your work on pages about various New York City Subway cars. I recently visited the New York Transit Museum and took some pictures of out-of-service cars on display there. I have a question about one of them, the Q-type Queens car: on the page you wrote (Q-type Queens car (New York City Subway car)), it says the car builder was a company called Peckham. However, on a picture I took of the sign next to the car, which I have uploaded to Wikipedia and is located at BMTQcarSign.JPG, if you zoom in you can see that it says the manufacturer was "Jewett Car Company." Can you please give me the source, if possible, that gave you "Peckham" as the manufacturer so we can resolve this? Thanks. Bobburito 01:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:PIC 0002.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PIC 0002.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ICTS

Fatpig, I have redirected "Intermidate Capacity Transit System" to Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit for two reasons:

they refer to the same system, and the Bombardier article is much more detailed; and
the word is "Intermediate" not "Intermidate".

Regards, Ground Zero | t 18:04, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thx

Hello Fat pig73! I want to thank you for creating the article about Dinu Bumbaru and Adrian Micu, even they are not complete, but we will anyway enlarge it. Cheers, NorbertArthur 14 April

Scajaquada

I don't know if you are aware of the New York state highways WikiProject, but I invite you to check it out as it seems you could make some contributions.

In the meantime, though, you created a bit of a mess in renaming New York State Route 198 that I am going to have to undo somehow before going to bed. Articles that are about named highways that also are signed and have the same coterminous route number are titled according to the route number, not their name.

This is the only Buffalo highway this rule applies to. I tried to move it back but I can't for some reason (it is necessary to preserve the page's edit history).

If you plan on creating any more articles about WNY numbered roads, please keep this in mind. Daniel Case 04:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also just undid your renaming of New York State Route 33 to Kensington Expressway. This was a little more serious, as the text in the article makes pretty clear that the Kensington is but a small stretch of a road that runs between Buffalo and Rochester. That's being a little too bold. Remember to look before you leap. Daniel Case 05:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Joykeep_3.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Joykeep_3.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joykeep_3.JPG

Did you take this photograph yourself and all the ones like it? --Gmaxwell 03:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Qorsion_Jeans_1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Qorsion_Jeans_1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:OBI Orion VII CNG 2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:OBI Orion VII CNG 2.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Gay Lea

You created an article on Gay Lea Co-operatives Limited barely three weeks ago, and Gay Lea today. I've already fixed the matter, so don't worry about it now, but in future could you please remember not to create duplicate articles on the same thing? If you think more than one search title is warranted, use the #REDIRECT tag for any titles other than the main article. Thanks. Bearcat 19:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sands Macau

I reverted your change that added a list of Macau casinos to the article. These are all listed in the Category at the end of the article. Generally you don't have both a list and categrory for things like this. If you think this list is really helpful, then creating a navigation template to include at the bottom of each article in Macau is a better solution. Vegaswikian 19:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bombardier_Flexity_LRV.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombardier_Flexity_LRV.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TTC_Security_Badge.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:TTC_Security_Badge.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cecilia Im article

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Cecilia Im, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Cecilia Im. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Peripitus 10:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ikea Etobicoke Shuttle Bus

Just wanted to make sure you knew that Ikea Etobicoke Shuttle Bus has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Sir Isaac Brock

A ship that was destroyed while under construction? Is this really an encyclopedia topic? PROD'ed. GRBerry 18:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Parliamentry Secretary (sic)

Hello. Please kindly make sure of the accuracy and proper spelling of your edits before you upload them. This is particularly important when you are creating articles. None of us are perfect, by any means, but avoiding typos in the article name itself is very important. And again, please do not categorize articles in both a main category and a sub-category, as you did in this article. When you are not careful with your spelling or your categorisation, other editors are required to put a lot of time and effort cleaning up after you. Thanks. --Skeezix1000 13:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colors in List of Colonial Governors of New York

Do you know why there are colors in List of Colonial Governors of New York? See our discussion at Talk:List of Colonial Governors of New York—Markles 13:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

Please point any mistakes if I have saying anything wrong. City Garden seem to be a hotel and private housing development with a garden open to public rathan than a garden alone. It is in Fortress Hill, North Point, not in Causeway Bay. Also, There is no such place called "Pacific Pallisades Gardens". There is "Pacific Palisades" in Braemar Hill. Again, it is a private housing estate. It is good that you are working hard on editing; it is better if you can do little more research on the edits when you upload it. Many thanks. Shrimp wong 06:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Categ CfD

Hi: You created the duplicate category Category:Israeli Defence Force since Category:Israel Defense Forces already exists. See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 September 15#Category:Israeli Defence Force. Please be more careful in the future to check that duplicates are not created. Thanks. IZAK 11:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about Chinese supreme court

Hi, I notice that you translate zh:高级人民法院 as Supreme People's Court (Provincial) and translate zh:中级人民法院 as High People's Court. I think that 高级人民法院 is usually translated as "High People's Court" or "Higher People' Court", and 中级人民法院 is usually translated as "Intermediate People's Court". I am considering move the current articles to their proper names. Please let me know your opinions. Thanks for your contributions. --Neo-Jay 13:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fc26.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fc26.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Companies

Articles are not to be filed in Category:Companies of Canada if they're already in subcategories such as Category:Financial services companies of Canada or Category:Manufacturing companies of Canada. Would you please start paying attention to these things when people mention them to you? Because I know this isn't the first time I've had to remind you how Wikipedia's category structure works. Bearcat 03:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC01291.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC01291.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Malton Airport map.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Malton Airport map.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GO Transit OBI Orion V.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GO Transit OBI Orion V.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:3404.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3404.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:4fad.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4fad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC01313.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC01313.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea

I note that you began this article. However, the SC of PNG is not actually a separately constituted court: like the Full Courts of the Supreme Courts the Australian States and formerly of the Supreme Courts of the Canadian Provinces (before the creation of the provincial Courts of Appeal early in the 20th century), it is an ad hoc tribunal consisting of judges of the National Court who are empanelled from time to time to hear specific appeals and references. The Chief Justice and the Registrar are "of the Supreme and National Courts"; the puisne justices are not actually referred to as justices of the Supreme Court. This article should really be renamed "Supreme and National Courts of Papua New Guinea" since discussion of the work of the SC in an article of its own is somewhat artificial given that it is actually an appellate committee. I, alas, don't know how to do this. Can you manage it? Masalai 00:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 01:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto City Council

Please don't repeat entire lists of people unnecessarily as you did in Toronto City Council. There was no need for you to add a "Current Councillors" list in addition to the table that was already present in the article (and already updated with the new councillors anyway). Bearcat 05:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

H. James Jones

Would you please pay attention when people tell you how to apply categorization on Wikipedia? Bearcat 03:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a great idea to delete warnings and requests from your talk page. The better approach would be to actually respond. Skeezix1000 17:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to a WikiProject

Dear Fat Pig73,

Our "WikiProject administrators" had reviewed articles that you have wrote a year to 2 years ago. We have discovered that you have a great experience of roads in the Golden Horseshoe. Not just only roads, but generally all the geographical features. This has attracted our attention. We sincerely invite you to join our WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads. Please reply to The Geography Expert to further discuss your role in the WikiProject as soon as possible.

-- The Geography Expert--Glad to serve you • Chat or discuss something with me • What I give This signature proofs that this discussion/article/section is official! 22:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mortiz Icy Squares

St. Mortiz Icy Squares has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==Big Land Farm Supermarket

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Big Land Farm Supermarket, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Big Land Farm Supermarket. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. DGG 04:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Eng family - PROD

Thisis to inform you that I've proposed three articles recently created by you (Susan, Hughes and Ben Eng) for deletion, because of lack of notability. Tikiwont 14:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

High court of appeals of Turkey

Hi, A long time ago, you created Turkish Court of Appeal (Cassation). In trying to improve this article, I came across High Court of Appeals of Turkey - I thought they looked like the same thing, so I merged them, since Legal System in the Republic of Turkey seems like it doesn't know about another civil high court of appeals. But you might know more about this than me - so please take a look! --Alvestrand 21:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join our WikiProject

Hi Fat pig 73,

I, on behalf of all the members in WP:GHR, would like you to join our Wikiproject. Our scope of the project is to write articles about all aterial routes, and highways in the Golden Horseshoe (or GTA). Through our edits, we have successfully completed a good coverage of some York Regional Roads. We have seen that you have made many articles dedicated to a lot of roads in the Greater Toronto Area or the Golden Horseshoe, such as Kennedy Road, Peel Region, Keele Street, etc. We sincerely want you to join in our team.

If you are not sure what the term Golden Horseshoe means, please read this article.

Note: We are currently working on York Regional Roads and Durham Regional Roads.

Please let me know if you have made your decision. We need your help!

--Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 21:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First Step Towards WP:GHR

Please sign up on our Paricipant List (Click on this link) under the subtitle of Participants, and please remember to add a template to your user page, so every Wikipedian would know you are part of this project.

Please enter this to your user page in order to create this template: {{Golden Horseshoe Roads}} And it would show up like this: {{Golden Horseshoe Roads}}.

And if you don't mind, I can do things listed above for you. --Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 21:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will send you the latest newslater of our WikiProject as soon as possible. It will probably be done by February 2, since I am kind of busy recently, working on List of Municipalities in the Golden Horseshoe.

How to communicate with the rest of us at WP:GHR

I forgot to mention this earlier, but you are free to discuss matters about WP:GHR at our Project's talk page, or User:Smcafirst/WP:GHR Message Centre. If the topic is urgent enough, place your comments at my talk page Thank you!

--Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 02:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saigon Passenger Transportation Company proposed for deletion

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Saigon Passenger Transportation Company, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

The PROD tag was removed, so I've listed the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saigon Passenger Transportation Company. —Doug Bell ^talk 21:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GHR Locations

Hi Fat pig73,

As per WP:GHR, we could like to know where everybody lives (in which city) so that I could divide the job equally. If you live outside of the Golden Horseshoe, you will be assigned of cleaning-up articles, while people who live in Golden Horseshoe and/or Southern Ontario (that's along the 401-corridor, south to Windsor, and north to Ottawa) will be assigned to create articles about their area.

Thank you for your continuous support!

Smcafirst | Chit-Chat posted at 04:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GHR's participants location!

Hi there, buddy,

As you had previously mentioned, you want to know where our participants live. I created a map just for you (despite the fact, we do not know where you, and bacl-presby lives). Note that there are 4 person living in York Region, 1 in Simcoe County, 1 in Halton Region, 1 in Hamilton, and 2 in Peel Region (which where I guess you and Bacl-Presby lives)

Smcafirst | Chit-Chat posted at 21:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Hamilton Mills

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article George Hamilton Mills, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 15:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woodbine Avenue

Another editor has listed an article that you have been involved in editing, Woodbine Avenue, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodbine Avenue. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Eastmain 03:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Peter Yuen

A tag has been placed on Peter Yuen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 01:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Boeing 717 operators

I've put the list back in the Boeing 717 article, and made the List of Boeing 717 operators page a redirect there. The list is very small, and will probably be a good candidate for AFD it remained there. As it is, the list is not likely to grow, as the plane is out of production. I hope you understand. - BillCJ 04:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Tse

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Amy Tse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 16:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centerpoint Mall (Toronto)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Centerpoint Mall (Toronto), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Seinfreak37 16:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Landmark (Toronto)

An editor has nominated The Landmark (Toronto), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Landmark (Toronto) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrice Foods Canada Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrice Foods Canada Ltd.

Propose delete on grounds of (non-) notability. Is there a Canadian in the house who can give me a steer on this one? --Gavin Collins 18:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Gavin Collins 18:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's notable, I doubt there are many Canadians who haven't heard of them. BoojiBoy 18:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I remember this brand -- it was a major brand -- and I was 8 when I emigrated. Sci girl 19:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's notable, used to be one of my favorite brands *smiles*. More seriously, was widely available where I live, I assume finding reliable sources should not be a problem, at least in the business press. Maegara 20:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Possibly the most well known dairy company in the country. --Djsasso 20:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, please. Keep. Canadian version of the late great conglomerate, Beatrice Foods, who we found out about after some massive advertising campaign in which they told us we've known them all along. Very notable and even the subject of many a weird joke. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily passes the standard laid out at WP:CORP. Eusebeus 00:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep National Brand in Canada, about the same importance as the US parent company Beatrice Foods, the brand is still in use in Canada. --M@sk 05:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Canadian military deaths from UN Missions

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Canadian military deaths from UN Missions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.145.161.43 14:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Choi Yuk Lin

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Choi Yuk Lin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.133.195.178 10:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chow Kai Yee

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Chow Kai Yee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.130.184.224 12:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion: Mary Pellatt

I thought you'd like to know about: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Pellatt, since the nominator has not notified you. -- Yellowdesk 02:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Preventative Police

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Federal Preventative Police, by Mike Payne (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Federal Preventative Police fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

redirects to itself

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Federal Preventative Police, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Federal Preventative Police itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Chin Minh City Hall

A tag has been placed on Ho Chin Minh City Hall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Crunch13 00:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GHR Update

Enclosed is a map of census divisions (so, counties/ regions / cities), and colour coded to show how are we doing in different parts of the Golden Horseshoe, and how much articles are written. Over the summer, I will create another similar one. The white parts of the map means that we will start to work on these areas, after the expansion of the project. (So, that is, after the creation of WP:QCWC (WikiProject Quebec City-Windsor Corridor).

Smcafirst 19:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Highland Farms

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Highland Farms, by 65.73.83.139 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Highland Farms is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Highland Farms, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Highland Farms itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macau

HI Fat Pig face. I would consider using Category:Macau politicians and and creating Category:Macau lawyers for bio articles on Macau personelle . Category:Macau judges already exists. Keep up the good work piggy cheeks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 13:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minority Party (Papua New Guinea)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Minority Party (Papua New Guinea), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Dbromage [Talk] 07:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Landon

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Gordon Landon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 11:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Étienne Trudeau

I don't think this article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

A tag has been placed on Étienne Trudeau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bond Head 15:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Fat pig73: 16% for major edits and 6% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 90 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:7aec.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:7aec.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

succession boxes -- Ontario judges

Just to let you know, I undid a few edits you made in April involving succession boxes for Ontario judges [2] [3] [4]. The Chief Justice of Ontario is the name given to the chief of the Ontario Court of Appeal. Patrick LeSage never sat on the Ontario Court of Appeal; he was Chief Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. --Mathew5000 15:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HomeShow.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HomeShow.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 18:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of James Marshall Tory

A tag has been placed on James Marshall Tory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Rackabello 21:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shomer Transportation

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Shomer Transportation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 13:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ty Truong

A tag has been placed on Ty Truong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lunchscale 19:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Naval Services (Canada)

A tag has been placed on Department of Naval Services (Canada), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backsplit

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Backsplit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Backsplit. -- Pepve (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Hi, you might want to archive some of your talk page, it's getting quite big... See Help:Archiving a talk page for more information. Have a nice day. -- Pepve (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Refuel2.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Refuel2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --—Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Chan Chi Kee

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chan Chi Kee, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chan Chi Kee is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chan Chi Kee, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xian H-8

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Xian H-8, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beijing Riviera (Beijing)

A tag has been placed on Beijing Riviera (Beijing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Poeloq (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Riverside Garden (Shenyang)

A tag has been placed on Riverside Garden (Shenyang) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Poeloq (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Riverside Garden (Shenyang)

I have nominated Riverside Garden (Shenyang), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Garden (Shenyang). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Poeloq (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Beijing Riviera (Beijing)

I have nominated Beijing Riviera (Beijing), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beijing Riviera (Beijing). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Poeloq (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Refuel2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Refuel2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Austin Villa (Panyu)

I have nominated Austin Villa (Panyu), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Villa (Panyu). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Poeloq (talk) 03:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSFLAG

WP:MOSFLAG = no flags in bio boxes. Please revert your edits for Jan. 25 that added flagicons as they are not allowed. If you don't then an administrator will revert your edits for you. 156.34.219.91 (talk) 13:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi buddy, please could you do Wikipedia a favour and undo your flag additions to the Canadian prime ministers articles? As stated above the flag icons shouldn't be used in the infoboxes of biography articles. Thank you :-) Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 14:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Old Canadian Bank of Commerce Building, Montreal

An editor has nominated Old Canadian Bank of Commerce Building, Montreal, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Canadian Bank of Commerce Building, Montreal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional leather fire helmets

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Traditional leather fire helmets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional leather fire helmets prod

Traditional leather fire helmets

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Traditional leather fire helmets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Traditional leather fire helmets. Benji boi 17:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Renée de Pelleport du Pont

A tag has been placed on Renée de Pelleport du Pont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moosato Cowabata (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zu Yi

Hi thanks for your contributions but could you please rewrite this so it isn't written like a poem? Cheers ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is your reference? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 22:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Yip

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Carmen Yip, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Carmen Yip. --Aervanath (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Khan Muhammad (District Councillor)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Malik Khan Muhammad (District Councillor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Marci Lipman

A tag has been placed on Marci Lipman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paste (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Phillippo

I saw your addition to Legislative Council of British Columbia. I'm very familiar with colonial BC history and have never heard his name before in any capacity, poitical or otherwise. Can you explain for me how it is that he's not mentioned in the source history of the council's composition and creation? How did he come to be on the Council? Please provide a citation and more details as to which district and/or if he was appointed or what; I should be able to find something on his being in the colonial cabinet as A-G in 1870, if he indeed was, and it strikes me that his tenure on the Legislative Council would have been brief as that body was abolished upon BC joining Confederation in 1871.Skookum1 (talk) 06:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Helicopter manufacturers in Britain

Category:Helicopter manufacturers in Britain, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hong Kong Adventure Corps

A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Adventure Corps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Canada Roads WikiProject

WikiProject Canada Roads
		Shortcuts WP:CANRD WP:CRWP
Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Canada Roads WikiProject! The Canada Roads WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Canadian Roads.
As you have shown an interest in Erin Mills Parkway we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh \| talk 04:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 07:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old Macau City Walls Sections

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Old Macau City Walls Sections, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.olamacauguide.com/old-city-walls.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Acadian

Category:Acadian, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Windsor Transmission

A tag has been placed on Windsor Transmission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. »xytram« talk 13:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Gatineau Police

A tag has been placed on Gatineau Police requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 01:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wind power stations

I wanted to let you know that some categories that you created (Category:Wind power stations by country) is being discussed at Categories for Discussion.Beagel (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rod Borghese

A tag has been placed on Rod Borghese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. freshacconcispeaktome 11:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian submarine Tonelero (S21)

Hi. I noticed a misprint in the title of this (two Ls in Brazilian) and took the liberty of moving it to the correct title. Now I'm a bit worried that, going back to the original title and clicking "what links here?" to check for double redirects, I see a huge list of ships in other navies. I looked in a couple of them and found no link to the "Brazillian" sub, so I don't know what's going on. Sorry if I have confused things. I see "Riachuelo (S22)" has also got two Ls in Brazilian, but I've left that for you. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baleno (Hong Kong)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Baleno (Hong Kong), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hoppyginko (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of York Inn

Hi. I was going to try to take a photo of it, but in the article, it makes no mention of where it is. Could you please add that info? Without it, the article is next to useless. Cheers, Oreo Priest ^talk 16:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Origins of the names of cities in the United States

An article that you have been involved in editing, Origins of the names of cities in the United States, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origins of the names of cities in the United States. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 01:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Faculty of Medicine - Université de Montréal

I have nominated Faculty of Medicine - Université de Montréal, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Medicine - Université de Montréal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 16x9 (talk) 21:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tai Po Kau Special Area

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tai Po Kau Special Area, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable special area

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gananoque Police Service

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gananoque Police Service, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cahk (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gatineau Police

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gatineau Police, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cahk (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gatineau Police

I have nominated Gatineau Police, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatineau Police. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. StarM 02:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Gatineau Police may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatineau Police.

The faster you respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Gatineau Police: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 12:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Garden Company Limited

A tag has been placed on Garden Company Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DFS454 (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: I've declined that speedy for the time being, but in the current shape the article would almost certainly be deleted in a deletion discussion. When writing new articles, make a point of citing reliable, third party sources such as books, newspapers or magazines to establish notability. Without these, deletion is very likely. With a few newspaper articles about a company cited, you're unlikely to be hassled about this. Cheers, Wily D 18:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Robert Middaugh

A tag has been placed on Robert Middaugh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 21:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bob Weaver

A tag has been placed on Bob Weaver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DSC01404.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DSC01404.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for Forts

Please note - your redirects for Forts are not working because you are including an equal sign. Please simply use #redirect link. JCutter (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darrigo's

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darrigo's, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PhilKnight (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of bridges and tunnels in Macau

I have nominated List of bridges and tunnels in Macau, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bridges and tunnels in Macau. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gananoque Police Service

I have nominated Gananoque Police Service, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gananoque Police Service. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kai Liu (Canadian police officer)

I have nominated Kai Liu (Canadian police officer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Liu (Canadian police officer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qorison

The article Qorison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a non-notable clothing store in China. I can't find any information on google news and google produces only 411 hits

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smartse (talk) 22:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jetliner Road

The article Jetliner Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor airport road with questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plastikspork (talk) 19:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silver Dart Drive

The article Silver Dart Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor airport road with questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plastikspork (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Convair Drive

The article Convair Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor airport road with questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plastikspork (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01651.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC01651.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edmonton Elks

The article Edmonton Elks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject notable for one event. If not deleted, then redirect to List of Grey Cup champions

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Defence of Vietnam

Thanks for starting this article on a subject we have little on. But it has no sources. Please add some sources or it is likely to be quickly deleted. As an alternative you could user-fy it. Buckshot06(prof) 19:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD note

The article Niagara Peninsula wineries has been proposed for deletion and included in the AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wineries and vineyards in Maine. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 06:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of TaiKo Supermarket

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is TaiKo Supermarket. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaiKo Supermarket. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sacred Heart Hospital (Scrubs)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sacred Heart Hospital (Scrubs). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Heart Hospital (Scrubs). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rampart General Hospital

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rampart General Hospital. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rampart General Hospital. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Langley Flying School

An article that you have been involved in editing, Langley Flying School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langley Flying School. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt (talk) 02:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fat pig73! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 41 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

William J. McCormack - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kwong Ki Chi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ahmad Husayn Khudayir as-Samarrai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Haiveta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nguyen Ngoc Ngan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ray Lui - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wayne Carew - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rebecca Chan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kaman Lee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yin-ling Lam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Leung Kwok-Shu 12. Gino Bucchino 13. Rob Rainford 14. Sam Hou Fai 15. Lai Kin Hong 16. Tam Hio Wa 17. Alice Leonor das Neves Costa 18. Lau Cheok Va 19. Nguyen Van Loc 20. John Calvert Griffiths 21. Vince Agro 22. Colin D'Cunha 23. Janette Luu 24. Cynthia Astwood 25. Mervyn Jones 26. Martin Bourke 27. Michael J. Bradley (Governor) 28. Christopher J. Turner 29. John Clifford Strong 30. Alexander Graham Mitchell 31. John Anthony Golding 32. Princess Noriko of Takamado 33. Princess Ayako of Takamado 34. Alan R. Graham 35. Alex Tilley 36. Kang Song-san 37. Fátima Choi 38. Zing (makeup artist) 39. Wong Chan Tong 40. Lai Kin Ian 41. Ho Ven On

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Khalid Usman

I have nominated Khalid Usman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Usman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 15:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beretta 92

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Beretta 92 and numerous other gun articles. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ROG5728 (talk) 22:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fire Services in Waterloo Region

The article Fire Services in Waterloo Region has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Fire Services in Waterloo Region – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Darkwind (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Crane Plumbing Corporation

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Crane Plumbing Corporation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crane Plumbing Corporation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Underwood, Ontario

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Underwood, Ontario. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwood, Ontario. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Brown's Corners, York Regional Municipality, Ontario

I have nominated Brown's Corners, York Regional Municipality, Ontario , an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown's Corners, York Regional Municipality, Ontario. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whenaxis (talk) 11:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Access roads at Toronto Pearson International Airport

The article Access roads at Toronto Pearson International Airport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability. These roads would be better suited to a List of roads in Toronto, and a List of roads in Mississauga/List of numbered roads in Peel Region.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 23:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

A tag has been placed on University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jet Asia

Hello Fat pig73, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Jet Asia, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:CaliforniaAliBaba. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:CaliforniaAliBaba. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of CaliforniaAliBaba (talk · contribs) 16:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 602nd Aircraft Design Institute

The article 602nd Aircraft Design Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for 3½ years, fails WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 10:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brad Giffen

The article Brad Giffen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Christopher Connor (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brad Giffen

The article Brad Giffen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. Completely unreferenced. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue Box (container) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Blue Box (container), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Box (container) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grey box (container)

The article Grey box (container) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

same rational as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Box (container)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Winnie Chui

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Winnie Chui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. _{Fusion Is the} Future 00:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NOW.com

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on NOW.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. _{Fusion Is the} Future 00:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janette Luu for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Janette Luu, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette Luu until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevin (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Calvert Griffiths

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Calvert Griffiths requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Nuujinn (talk) 02:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Calvert Griffiths for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article John Calvert Griffiths, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Calvert Griffiths until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lai Kin Hong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lai Kin Hong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Graham Colm (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leung Kwok-Shu

The article Leung Kwok-Shu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV anchor. No RS independent of subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sailsbystars (talk) 19:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Anthony Golding

The article John Anthony Golding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability. Unsourced biography (WP:BLP).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kubanczyk (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kayle Short

The article Kayle Short has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet WP:NSPORTS; he has never played in the top tier of his league, nor is there verification that he played 100+ games in the American Hockey League as is required to meet WP:NHOCKEY.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 04:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some Toronto road stuff

Hello good sir

As part of a stub elimination drive at WP:ONRD, I'm liiking to redirect some of the Toronto road articles you created to List of roads in Toronto, as a few are pretty sparse and are roads with no history behind them. Would you have any objections to this? - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 06:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Markham Road

The article Markham Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability and no history

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 06:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winnie Chui for deletion

The article Winnie Chui is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnie Chui until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aeroquay Crescent for deletion

The article Aeroquay Crescent is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroquay Crescent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keele Street for deletion

The article Keele Street is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keele Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 22:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parliament Street (Toronto) for deletion

The article Parliament Street (Toronto) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parliament Street (Toronto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 22:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morningside Avenue (Toronto) for deletion

The article Morningside Avenue (Toronto) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morningside Avenue (Toronto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 23:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ministry of Public Safety and Security (Ontario)

The article Ministry of Public Safety and Security (Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The information in this referenced stub is available at Ministry of Correctional Services and Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario). A redirect would serve better than repeating information here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeffJ (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Category:Light and Heavy Rail car builders

see Category re CFD discussion Hugo999 (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UBC Faculty of Medicine

The article UBC Faculty of Medicine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - per WP:OUTCOMES#Education "Departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field... or produced a number of notable graduates."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Chan Tong

Is this person really notable? How could he satisfy the WP:GNG? I tend to think that only the elected ministers are notable, not the unelected public servants. I see above that you were notified of 41 Unreferenced BLPs that you had created, I just checked and there are only three left - Tam Hio Wa & Yin-ling Lam are the other two. If you helped to reference the others, thank you. I would really appreciate it if you could help to reference the last three. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jin Xing (Aisin Gioro)

The article Jin Xing (Aisin Gioro) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Jin Xing (Aisin Gioro) – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKiernan (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fangda Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fangda Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (talk) 02:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haiwen & Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haiwen & Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 65-67 Bellwoods Avenue, Toronto

The article 65-67 Bellwoods Avenue, Toronto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marginal historical significance, and there's no indication or evidence that the place meets notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 13:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Métis Transit Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Métis Transit Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Métis Transit Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russel Brothers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Russel Brothers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phearson (talk) 19:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01653.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC01653.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01668.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC01668.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheung Pui Ling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheung Pui Ling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheung Pui Ling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 01:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wai-shing Lai

The article Wai-shing Lai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Wai-shing Lai – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a WP:PEOPLE that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 09:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jolly Wong

The article Jolly Wong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Jolly Wong – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a WP:PEOPLE that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 09:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaman Lee

The article Kaman Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Kaman Lee – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a WP:PEOPLE that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 09:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John A. Rae

The article John A. Rae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with one deadlink source which (via Wayback Machine) doesn't constiture significant coverage. No other significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Delcan

A tag has been placed on Delcan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is spam and would take a major effort to get it into shape

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of City Garden

The article City Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable real estate article. No independent references with significant content. See precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Palazzo (Hong Kong).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HK housing estates articles

Your input would be useful at the discussion that I have started on the topic, and where I have given some background. Plase see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Thank you. olivier (talk) 20:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fire departments of Australia

Category:Fire departments of Australia, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Satu Suro 12:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:ACAC aircraft

Category:ACAC aircraft, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Fat pig73! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposed deletion of Haiwen & Partners

Hello, Fat pig73, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Haiwen & Partners, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Mt king ^(edits) 02:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CCGS Tracy

The article body of CCGS Tracy contains the same text that CCGS Bartlett does. I don't know if this was a mistake or what your intentions were but something needs a fixing. thanks. Brad (talk) 04:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haiwen & Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haiwen & Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commerce & Finance Law Offices

The article Commerce & Finance Law Offices has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 02:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fangda Partners

The article Fangda Partners has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 02:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy armed merchant cruisers

Category:Royal Canadian Navy armed merchant cruisers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy auxiliary ships

Category:Royal Canadian Navy auxiliary ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy icebreakers

Category:Royal Canadian Navy icebreakers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy sloops

Category:Royal Canadian Navy sloops, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy support ships

Category:Royal Canadian Navy support ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy torpedo boats

Category:Royal Canadian Navy torpedo boats, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy training ships

Category:Royal Canadian Navy training ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Royal Canadian Navy trawlers

Category:Royal Canadian Navy trawlers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canadian Forces support ships

Category:Canadian Forces support ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canadian Forces training ships

Category:Canadian Forces training ships, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qorsion Label.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Qorsion Label.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Po Sum On

The article Po Sum On has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

advertisment

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 21:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Po Sum On for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Po Sum On is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Po Sum On until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 21:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tai Pan Tours

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tai Pan Tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Windsor Crossing Premium Outlets

The article Windsor Crossing Premium Outlets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable shopping mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 19:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi Fat pig73,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commie blocks

Hi, although the term "commie blocks" has widespread use on blogs & forums, it was removed from the main article Architecture of Toronto as too colloquial [5], so I removed it from the article tower block. If you can provide a citation according to WP:IRS, I suggest you first put it back into the Toronto article to see if it is accepted there. – Fayenatic L (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New National Steel Car article

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for creating the new National Steel Car article, and improving Wikipedia's coverage of notable companies. Your efforts to improve the encyclopedia are appreciated. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited National Steel Car, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Passenger car and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crane Plumbing Corporation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crane Plumbing Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited Andy Byford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Transport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion notification

Nomination of The Landmark (Toronto) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Landmark (Toronto) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Landmark (Toronto) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tom Reedy (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rouge Fairways, Ontario for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rouge Fairways, Ontario is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rouge Fairways, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mind matrix 17:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of modern buildings and structures in Mississauga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of modern buildings and structures in Mississauga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modern buildings and structures in Mississauga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of oldest buildings and structures in Mississauga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of oldest buildings and structures in Mississauga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of oldest buildings and structures in Mississauga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Victor Fung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to American

William Fung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

International Semi Tech Microsystems (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Markham

James Henry Ting Wei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sansui

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand River Raceway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OLG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:French Governors of Mauritius

Category:French Governors of Mauritius, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kingroyos (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dutch Governors of Mauritius

Category:Dutch Governors of Mauritius, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kingroyos (talk) 20:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Railway Lands, Toronto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Front Street and Bathurst Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Railway Lands, Toronto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Front Street and Bathurst Street

Durham Regional Police Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Winnebago

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meadowvale Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar Parliament

Hello! I don't know why you removed the Speakers of the Legislative Council of Gibraltar, the predecessor of the Gibraltar Assembly. I have, however, reinstated it.

Mbakkel2 17th of April 2013, 17:28 (CEST)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gibraltar Legislative Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Britain, British, William Thompson and Kenneth Anderson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Niagara Frontier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niagara Frontier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niagara Frontier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Powers ^T 12:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft

Template:Canadian Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MilborneOne (talk) 19:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bank card number, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CIBC and BMO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Assembly Building of Belize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HD Mining International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Bigwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake of Bays (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Pearson (Canadian diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Pearson (Canadian diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pearson (Canadian diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Alcoholic beverage control in Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Alcoholic beverage control in Canada. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Alcohol_laws#Canada. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Alcohol_laws#Canada – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William F. Bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 602nd Anti-Aircraft Artillery Gun Battalion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Lambton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hedworth Lambton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawker Siddeley RTC-85SP/D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MARC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manchu Wok

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manchu Wok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 20:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amber Scott (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caporal Kaeble

Caporal Kaeble is the correct name of the ship - it is not Corporal Kaeble as it is someone's name, not their rank. Also please do not make cut-and-paste moves as they create WP:COPYVIO due to breaking the attribution chain that Wikipedia's licensing requires. Thanks. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orion Bus Industries Orion-Ikarus 286, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amber Scott (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Scott (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Scott (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:11, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 444 Combat Support Squadron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Ward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leamington Transit

Where did you get the Fleet info? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sea Robin XFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of B.E.M. Fireworks warehouse explosion

The article B.E.M. Fireworks warehouse explosion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. No historical significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reso lute 17:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huaxia Art Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanshan District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republic of China Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hualien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#.5BRD.5D_Jim_Flaherty

Jim Flaherty has been nominated for "recent deaths" on the main page. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfD of Japanese aircraft carrier Project Number G18

Hello. I've nominated the above article for deletion. The discussion can be found here. Thanks.

Oh, and archive your page already :P Parsecboy (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–present) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–present) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–present) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Ditson Service, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lawrence Park and John Lombardi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ho Lee Chow

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ho Lee Chow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yacatisma (talk) 21:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Intria Items

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intria Items requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Mdann52talk to me! 10:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intria Items for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intria Items is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intria Items until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Revent^talk 10:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Intria Items

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intria Items, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rob Ford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Academics and Royals

The article Academics and Royals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTCRUFT, bordering on original research. orphaned, nothing reaches here anyway

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fu Bingchang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Executive Committee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Fat pig73! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Private colleges under licence in Ontario

Category:Private colleges under licence in Ontario, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chinese firefighting tank

The article Chinese firefighting tank has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zing (makeup artist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zing (makeup artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Fauqueur listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yves Fauqueur. Since you had some involvement with the Yves Fauqueur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Neve-selbert 04:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of People's Transit Company

The article People's Transit Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bick's Pickle

Hello – do you have a source for your assertion in the Bick's Pickle article that Bick's was acquired by Kraft in 1966? All the corporate histories out there say that the Bick family sold directly to Robin Hood Multifoods. Are they guilty of oversimplification, or were you confused when you wrote that? – Justinbb (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand River Naval Depot, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Commodore and Six Nations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bank of Nova Scotia Building, Havana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neoclassical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fat pig73. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Capra III for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Capra III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Capra III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 20:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of historic buildings in Guangzhou

The article List of historic buildings in Guangzhou has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WdS | Talk 12:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Concord Pacific Developments

The article Concord Pacific Developments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a catalog of their projects--nothing more

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 09:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Riverdale, Toronto, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belleville, Ontario

I noticed you added a four sentence section to Belleville, Ontario. The first sentence has a source, but the last three do not. Are they unsourced, or should the source have been placed at the end of the sentence? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Island Medical Program

The article Island Medical Program has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no 2ndary indep sources - fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 10:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northern Medical Program

The article Northern Medical Program has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no 2ndary indep sources - fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 10:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Onigara

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ongiara (ferry boat) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Onigara (ferry boat). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 21:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RBC WaterPark Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Market Square Shopping Centre (Kitchener), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Record and Subway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pearson and Darling buildings has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pearson and Darling buildings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rotem Bi-Level Cars

A tag has been placed on Rotem Bi-Level Cars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-paste of Rotem Commuter Cars, created by the same editor.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —JJ Be rs 02:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

@Fat pig73: It seems like you've never used you're own user talk pages, and have only edited a talk page twice in the last 12 years. I would recommend using talk pages, or it can lead to some issues sometime. —JJ Be rs 02:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tahir Yahya

The article Tahir Yahya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources for 8+ years. Without sources this is unencyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Endercase (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

homeportfolio.com as an external link

I see you added it a very long time ago, and wanted to see what you felt about it now. [6] I run into it occassionally, and have been meaning to look into it more carefully. --Ronz (talk) 23:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Northern Telecom home phones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Telecom home phones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Telecom home phones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SophisticatedSwampert ^Talk _contribs 01:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insignia, staff superintendent (Toronto Police Service).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Insignia, staff superintendent (Toronto Police Service).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Insignia, deputy chief of police (Toronto Police Service).jpg

The file File:Insignia, deputy chief of police (Toronto Police Service).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

too low resolution to be of encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Insignia, chief of police (Toronto Police Service).jpg

The file File:Insignia, chief of police (Toronto Police Service).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

too low resolution to be of encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Insignia, sergeant (Toronto Police Service).jpg

The file File:Insignia, sergeant (Toronto Police Service).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

too low resolution to be of encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Insignia, police constable (Toronto Police Service).jpg

The file File:Insignia, police constable (Toronto Police Service).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

too low resolution to be of encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allen Road.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Allen Road.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mad Dog and Billie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mad Dog and Billie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Dog and Billie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of (minor) bridges in Toronto listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of (minor) bridges in Toronto. Since you had some involvement with the List of (minor) bridges in Toronto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toronto EMS.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toronto EMS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kowloon Motor Bus fleet numbering

The article Kowloon Motor Bus fleet numbering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced article with no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 358.5 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Provincial Secretary (Manitoba), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Howard and Joseph Burke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Counties of Ontario

Template:Central Counties of Ontario has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Railway Transport Court (China)

The article Railway Transport Court (China) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:UNSOURCED stub created 11 years ago and that was tagged 8 years ago but has remained unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public sector positions has been nominated for discussion

Category:Public sector positions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fat pig73. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Municipal Service Car

The article Municipal Service Car has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about an unnotable topic, and not enough incoming links to make a redirect viable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Municipal Service Car for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Municipal Service Car is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Municipal Service Car until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chinese air defence vehicles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Chinese air defence vehicles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 22:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Militia

The article Canadian Militia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MILUNIT. Most of the online hits are mirrors of Wikipedia. It's been unsourced since 2009, which I take as evidence that no one has information on the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Militia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Militia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Militia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holy Cross Cemetery, Thornhill, Ontario

The article Holy Cross Cemetery, Thornhill, Ontario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A cemetery, what significance does it have? Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

a heads-up

I changed this edit because I think it does not comply with the standards for disambiguation pages -- they are not supposed to contain piped links. Geo Swan (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Firefighting officers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Firefighting officers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Galleria Supermarket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galleria Supermarket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galleria Supermarket (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zachary Taylor Wood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zachary Taylor Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Taylor Wood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Police detachment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Police detachment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police detachment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Police office for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Police office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police office until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ikeda Jeans

The article Ikeda Jeans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references, WP:CORPSPAM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wolfson5 (talk) 18:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, Fat pig73. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal. There is help available at THE TEAHOUSE. Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Central Policy Unit

The article Central Policy Unit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The Central Policy Unit no longer exists, the external link is dead, and this page consists almost entirely of outdated directory information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fat pig73. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Sinclair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superintendent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wong Nai Chung Gap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ming Pao Daily News (Canada) and Sing Tao Daily (Canada)

Epoch Times is not a reliable source. Please don't use them as citation. Also relocation looks like hoax. Matthew hk (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am no fan of Epoch Times given their link to Falun Gong, but given I am from Hong Kong, the coverage of both Sing Tao and Ming Pao in Toronto are their views are vetted by Beijing. In the case of Sing Tao Toronto the partial ownership by the Toronto Star does not make them unbias and pro-Beijing.

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phyllis Ross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mulgrave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Clifford Alexander Jr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Private

Gilles Lamontagne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pilot

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eastern Harbour Crossing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dunedin, Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunedin Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joykeep Jeans

The article Joykeep Jeans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP due to a lack of sigcov turned up by "joykeep+jeans" source searches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TB Jeans

The article TB Jeans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A "TB+Jeans"+-wikipedia+-wiki source search turns up little evidence of major reviews or significant coverage which is in-depth enough to satisfy WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 13:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Ditson Service for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Ditson Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ditson Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bruce Sinclair (politician)

The article Bruce Sinclair (politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DannyS712 (talk) 01:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soichiro Ito (Japanese politician)

The article Soichiro Ito (Japanese politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SSSB (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consider archiving

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 398.8 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 08:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of East Isle Shipyard

Hello Fat pig73,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged East Isle Shipyard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Markham District High School, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". What are you doing? You have been here more than long enough to know that those are not minor edits., Meters (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Court of General Jurisdiction of the People's Republic of China for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Court of General Jurisdiction of the People's Republic of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court of General Jurisdiction of the People's Republic of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viztor (talk) 12:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Macau order of precedence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Macau order of precedence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macau order of precedence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Memotec Data Incorporated

The article Memotec Data Incorporated has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Organisation with not nearly enough cites (in the article, or available through my WP:BEFORE to meat WP:ORGCRITE. Claim to notability through an acquisition (otherwise I'd have A7d) but not nearly sufficient to meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hug^syrup 09:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada

A tag has been placed on Category:Roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Hi Fat pig73. I noticed that you recently used ethnicelebs.com as a source for information in a biography article, Andrew Scheer. Please note that there is general consensus that ethnicelebs.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New aviation articles

Please use Template:WPAVIATION creator for new aviation articles, as it will save you a lot of trouble and much reduce the need to re-write your articles.--Petebutt (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wong Lop Kong

The article Wong Lop Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2009. Haven't been able to find any sources indicating this is a particularly notable preparation. Attempt to search Chinese name was not fruitful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guillem d'Areny-Plandolit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Royal School of Infantry

The article Royal School of Infantry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for more than 13 years. I can barely verify this existed. Almost all search results are for schools/divisions elsewhere. I'd redirect it to Manitoba Rugby Football Union, but if there are other subjects by this name that doesn't make sense.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meadowvale Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meadowvale Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowvale Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Username6892 (talk) 01:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Haligonians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haligonians. Since you had some involvement with the Haligonians redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camilla Di Giuseppe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camilla Di Giuseppe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. User:Namiba 15:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camilla Di Giuseppe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camilla Di Giuseppe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla Di Giuseppe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sichuan Lantian Helicopter Company Limited

The article Sichuan Lantian Helicopter Company Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shantavira|^{feed me} 14:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dixie Mall (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dixie Mall (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie Mall (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dixie Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dixie Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Type 83/WM-40

The article Type 83/WM-40 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 06:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Rowntree (Canadian)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Rowntree (Canadian) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.toronto.ca/data/parks/prd/facilities/complex/22/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themillofkeytone (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Toronto Council

Hi, I've tried to expand the Metropolitan Toronto Council article you started years ago. I've listed Metro councillors up to the 1966 amalgamation. I'm wondering if you could take a look and if you'd be interested in working on the article at all so that it lists all councillors until Metro was disbanded in 1997? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.72.204.218 (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dallas Smith Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dallas Smith Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Smith Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BD2412 T 19:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harbin First Machinery Building Group Ltd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harbin First Machinery Building Group Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbin First Machinery Building Group Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. W. Ellis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. W. Ellis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. W. Ellis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamilton Isane Asylum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamilton Isane Asylum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Isane Asylum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Poydoo can talk and edit 14:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E-One for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E-One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sam at Megaputer (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your amazing article 6th Submarine Division!! If you happen to be interested in working on the other regional ones, there's a little bit of extra data at List_of_squadrons_and_flotillas_of_the_Royal_Navy#Submarines Buckshot06 (talk) 09:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlottetown Police Service for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlottetown Police Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlottetown Police Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Apocheir (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plague City: SARS in Toronto

The article Plague City: SARS in Toronto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hockey Night in Asia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hockey Night in Asia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hockey Night in Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Official residences in Hong Kong

Template:Official residences in Hong Kong has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TAS5500 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAS5500 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAS5500 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hike Metal Products for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hike Metal Products is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hike Metal Products until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ajshul ^<talk> 14:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of historic buildings in Quebec City

Being that you created the above, I was wondering if you had any good websites that can be used as sources for historic buildings around the city. I'm having to search Google Books currently, which isn't ideal. Seasider53 (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kowloon Dairy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kowloon Dairy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kowloon Dairy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Primefac (talk) 09:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lexington-class battlecruiser

Hey there, I ended up reverting your edits on this article because MOS:OVERLINK says that disambiguation pages "should not be linked from articles unless the link is purposeful in a hatnote." Apologies for the trouble! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cleva North America

The article Cleva North America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Nothing comes up in searches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amon Stutzman (talk) 23:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. C. Harris Water Treatment Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice - action needed

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the persistent addition of unsourced content and a complete failure to communicate with other editors. You have 8300+ edits and not a single talk page edit addressing the sourcing concerns raised by other editors for years. The block is not intended to be permanent; you can be unblocked once you post an appeal that states you will follow the requirements for reliable sourcing and will endeavour to communicate with other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also the block message on the talk page of your undisclosed alternative account as well as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fat pig73.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cleva North America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cleva North America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleva North America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loafiewa (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shaanxi SX2190

The article Shaanxi SX2190 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insignificant coverage. One selfpub source. One USERG social media source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samuel Jarvis (American)

The article Samuel Jarvis (American) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability, accuracy and inline citations. According to the information in the single working external link, the creator of the article appears to have confused Samuel Jarvis with his son.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baker's Dozen Donuts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baker's Dozen Donuts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker's Dozen Donuts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

747pilot (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David S. Cunningham III for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David S. Cunningham III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David S. Cunningham III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Triodetic dome

The article Triodetic dome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero sources, not even clear what it is, and searching the name just comes up with a company called Triodetic that builds domes. Far as I can tell, it doesn't follow WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 15:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pacific Gateway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pacific Gateway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Gateway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinsmen Stadium

The article Kinsmen Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable municipal baseball stadium, with only listings in directories. Cannot find significant coverage for the stadium.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flibirigit (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:French forts in the United States has been nominated for renaming

Category:French forts in the United States has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 02:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Major Mackenzie Drive

Hello Fat pig73, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Major Mackenzie Drive, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Mackenzie Drive.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hewitt's Dairy

The article Hewitt's Dairy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Originally tagged for speedy deletion by User:ReadThePlotBeforeWatching in Special:Diff/1237203083 with the rationale: Delete as it does not seem to be prominent enough to have its own article (not much news articles on it, no prominent events with this dairy producer, etc.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nickps (talk) 14:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haciz Courts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haciz Courts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haciz Courts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Great stuff!

Rivers of Toronto

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events

Runway numbering

Sir

Eglinton West stations

TTC cleanup

TTC Subway Lines

Categorizing

Image:7f87.jpg listed for deletion

Accuracy

Roads on AfD

More roads on AfD

Simpson's

Canadian police forces

See also sections in articles

Rochester Subway rolling stock?

Title first reference

Image:Vivayork Van Hool AG300 5208.jpg listed for deletion

Image copyright problem with Image:Cityflagcol.gif

Image Tagging Image:5f88.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Qorsion_Label.JPG

Succession boxes

Image Tagging Image:DSC01291.JPG

Image copyright problem with Image:A846.jpg

Notability

Edit summary

Image copyright problem with Image:DSC01179.JPG

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DSC01323.JPG)

Image Tagging Image:Milliken GO Station.jpg

New York City Subway BMT Q car

Image Tagging Image:PIC 0002.JPG

ICTS

Thx

Scajaquada

Image Tagging for Image:Joykeep_3.JPG

Image copyright problem with Image:Qorsion_Jeans_1.JPG

License tagging for Image:OBI Orion VII CNG 2.JPG

Gay Lea

Sands Macau

Image copyright problem with Image:Bombardier_Flexity_LRV.JPG

Image copyright problem with Image:TTC_Security_Badge.JPG

Cecilia Im article

Ikea Etobicoke Shuttle Bus

Categories

Categories

Canadian Parliamentry Secretary (sic)

Colors in List of Colonial Governors of New York

Accuracy

Duplicate Categ CfD

about Chinese supreme court

Image tagging for Image:Fc26.jpg

Companies

Image:DSC01291.JPG listed for deletion

Image:Malton Airport map.JPG listed for deletion

Image:GO Transit OBI Orion V.JPG listed for deletion

Image:3404.jpg listed for deletion

Image:4fad.jpg listed for deletion

Image:DSC01313.JPG listed for deletion

Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea

link to British

Invitation to a WikiProject

==Big Land Farm Supermarket

Eng family - PROD

High court of appeals of Turkey

Invitation to join our WikiProject

First Step Towards WP:GHR

How to communicate with the rest of us at WP:GHR

Saigon Passenger Transportation Company proposed for deletion

WP:GHR Locations

WP:GHR's participants location!

Woodbine Avenue

Speedy deletion of Peter Yuen

List of Boeing 717 operators

AfD nomination of The Landmark (Toronto)

Beatrice Foods Canada Ltd.

Canadian military deaths from UN Missions

Choi Yuk Lin

Chow Kai Yee